Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Virginia Postrel's avatar

Great essay. I didn't find the "boring" parts you quoted boring in the least, either here or when I listened to the Hootkins audio book. I like learning how people do things, so they were intrinsically interesting to me, but they're also quietly hilarious. People don't talk enough about how funny Melville can be, which Hootkins's excellent narration really brings out.

Expand full comment
Rob Cobbs's avatar

It's been eight or nine years since I reread it, but MD is a strong contender for my favorite book, and I kind of especially love the whaling chapters. They're not monoliths, they do a lot of different kinds of work, but I think it's helpful to think of them generally as pacing devices, breaking up the action of the book and controlling the tone, regulating the momentum big plot-driven thematic elements.

So in addition to the thematic work you identify, establishing the kind of commercial line that distinguishes the insane Ahab from the sane(r) crew, the "boring" chapters build tension between events. They mirror the punctuated excitement of life at sea - one minute you're trying not to die in a tiny boat pulled by a huge and angry force of nature, the next you're covering your entire body in tattoos or becoming an expert scrimshaw artist because there's literally nothing else to do. In turn, that whiplash alternation between boredom and terror broadly serves the broader nihilism of the novel (cf. war stories, especially Vietnam-era and later).

The other thing about the whaling chapters is they're often funny as hell. Melville is fucking funny, and his humor and playfulness shine through most often when we have a respite from the existential terror bits. Sometimes the humor consists in straight-up jokes or tongue-in-cheek narration, like the overblown exegesis on odor you quote. It serves the tonal regulation function I mention above, and also characterizes Ishmael, giving him a wry self-awareness that offsets his romanticism. The narration follows his own moods and gives him life.

But the whaling chapters also often have a humorous metatextual dimension - it's FUNNY that Melville pauses the plot to drag the reader in detail through the minutiae of the whaling industry. He KNOWS it's boring, at least superficially. He's playing with the reader, using his control over the text to manipulate how the reader feels, and it's funny to pull back the curtain on that manipulation by conspicuously jolting the momentum of a standard adventure book.

That break in the fourth wall also makes you think of the novel as a composed work, driven by an author with his own motives and vicissitudes, which serves the thematics of the novel. The author's manipulation of the reader according to his arbitrary whims serves, I think, as a metaphor for the cruel and angry God (or remorselessly uncaring nature) with whom/which the book grapples. But it also just is good in itself - I find it enjoyable to read, even when I'm sort of bored.

It probably helps that I'm not too bored - at times Melville seems to be kind of kidding on the square, indulging in stuff he knows will be boring to a lot of people but was really important to him when he was at sea, internal discourses on the whale and whaling that amused and fascinated him when he was deadly bored. If, like me, you take a lot of joy in the world in uncovering something new and interesting in stuff you didn't know before, it really takes the edge off the basic unpleasantness of being bored and allows you to enjoy the digressions and ponder their broader function in the work without just putting the whole novel down in frustration.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts