Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Virginia Postrel's avatar

I understand your critique of Greenblatt's comment, but we don't know what else he said in the interview. More important, his point about long form television is exactly what I'd expect to hear from a historically oriented Shakespeare scholar. What Shakespeare did was take an existing popular medium that produced mostly forgettable entertainment (Marlowe aside) and elevate it to great art. Greenblatt is arguing that something similar is happening in our time. He's thinking about what interests him, not what interests the journalist interviewing him.

Expand full comment
Brooke Wonders's avatar

You might be interested in this oldie but goodie: Elif Batumen's review of Mark McGurl's The Program Era, in which she argues that shame is a driving force in the academic study of creative writing. Reading your piece, I had to wonder why someone like Greenblatt would deny his own intellectual life, and I kept landing on shame as the answer (projection? perhaps). "Taught for too long and fallen out of love with the material" also makes sense, as Gnocchic Apocryphon writes below, though I find the Greenblattian attitude in junior faculty and graduate students, too.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts